<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angel&#8217;s Landing</title>
	<link>http://www.descendingashtray.com/archives/580</link>
	<description>Collaborations in Art by Gabe Lueders and Dave Selden</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.descendingashtray.com/archives/580#comment-13592</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.descendingashtray.com/archives/580#comment-13592</guid>
		<description>Wow, that does look amazing. What kind of panel is it on? Is it textured or smooth? I know so little about painting, it's kind of shocking. I should really try it one of these days.

I think the rock in the front right is giving some trouble. It appears to have the same color intensity and clarity as the more distant rock formations, and doesn't add a lot to either the depth or the composition. I'd either omit it or work on giving it more importance. Overall, I think the depth is understated, at least from what I can see from a small photo!

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that does look amazing. What kind of panel is it on? Is it textured or smooth? I know so little about painting, it&#8217;s kind of shocking. I should really try it one of these days.</p>
<p>I think the rock in the front right is giving some trouble. It appears to have the same color intensity and clarity as the more distant rock formations, and doesn&#8217;t add a lot to either the depth or the composition. I&#8217;d either omit it or work on giving it more importance. Overall, I think the depth is understated, at least from what I can see from a small photo!</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
